| 翻訳と辞書 |
| BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority
''BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority'', () 1 S.C.R. 12 is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held that there is a ''prima facie'' presumption that a claimant is able to sue concurrently in tort and contract where sufficient grounds exist. Still, liability in tort will still be subject to an exemptions or conditions set out in a contract.
==Background==
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority called for tenders to erect power lines. BG Checo International Ltd. was interested in making a tender and so did a survey of the land by helicopter. On viewing the area they noted that the area was in the process of being clear-cut. BG Checo issued a tender and won. The tender was incorporated into the contract and included terms stating that BG Checo would have no part in clearing a right-of-way to the land. Once the agreement was made no further clearing was done which resulted significant difficulties for BG Checo.
BG Checo sued in tort of negligent misrepresentation and in the alternative breach of contract. The key issue is the case was whether the terms of the contract precluded BG Checo from suing in tort.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|